<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="feed.xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>https://articles.thomosaic.com/</id>
    <title>Thoughts.Mosaic</title>
    <updated>2026-04-06T15:09:22.075Z</updated>
    <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
    <author>
        <name>CHEN ZHENG</name>
        <email>chen@thomosaic.com</email>
        <uri>https://thomosaic.com</uri>
    </author>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/"/>
    <subtitle>Every piece of thoughts begins as a mosaic.</subtitle>
    <logo>https://articles.thomosaic.com/favicon-96x96.png</logo>
    <icon>https://articles.thomosaic.com/favicon.ico</icon>
    <rights>All Rights Reserved © 2026 CHEN ZHENG</rights>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Against Myself]]></title>
        <id>en/against-myself</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/against-myself"/>
        <updated>2026-04-05T17:39:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Why is it only humans who have thoughts of suicide?]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know how your life will end.</p>
<p>Born into chaos, you will dissolve back into the chaos of the future.</p>
<p>What kind of life will you have lived?</p>
<p>I know — you are the protagonist of your own story. But the direction of this story is not yours to decide. You are only the lead character; you are not the writer. Or perhaps you are just a puppet, one that has stumbled into its own consciousness, pulled along by the strings of fate.</p>
<p>You are always complaining that time moves too fast. Each year feels more rushed than the last, without that poetic, unhurried quality of childhood. Always chasing something.</p>
<p>Those moments from the past — some of them were wet and heavy too. It’s just that under time’s relentless sun, only the bright, dry, nostalgic ones remain.</p>
<p>All the wet moments have been dried out.</p>
<p>You are always comparing yourself to others, watching what people your age are doing. As if you are forever running behind.</p>
<p>But you are not other people. Right now, you are not even yourself.</p>
<p>I don’t know how you really want to live this life. You bought two books about suicide. You once discussed a fascinating question with an AI: why is it only humans who have thoughts of suicide?</p>
<p>You often think — if you were just a little cat, or an insect that lives and dies within a single day, would all of this trouble disappear? After fulfilling the purpose of mating, you could quietly accept your own vanishing.</p>
<p>You are always fighting against yourself.</p>
<p>You are afraid of yourself. I know.</p>
<p>Sometimes you think: how peaceful it would be to simply disappear from this world, without attachment, without a trace. It’s not that you hate your life — you love it, you treasure it — but because of your particular fastidiousness, you cannot tolerate certain extra “performances” it demands. You despise the idea of life as a grand theatrical production. You only want to be yourself. But that is so terribly hard.</p>
<p>You have asked many AIs about this too. Whether it was something in the way you phrased things, every single one of them triggered a safety response and sent you a list of hotline numbers. You have no desire to call any of them.</p>
<p>You have already done so much. I know.</p>
<p>You have a decent enough job, a stable income, ample free time. Enough to make many people envious, and you know it. You sometimes feel that this might be some kind of cosmic arrangement — as if the universe, sensing that you are already grappling with one of life’s great questions, has decided to go easy on you in matters of survival, at least for now.</p>
<p>But what can you do? Only bury your head like an ostrich, leaving every difficulty for your future self. Still, you cannot live in the present. It is the homework left unfinished on the last day of summer break. It is the final big question on the math exam. It is the life you want to live, and the life you are living now.</p>
<p>I don’t know what exactly you are running from. You have imagined too many monsters lurking behind too many doors, and you are afraid of them.</p>
<p>Yes. You want to die. Not because you hate yourself, and certainly not because you are tired of living. Only — only because you don’t know how to keep walking along the river of life.</p>
<p>You cannot hand in the answer sheet you want, or the one others want from you.</p>
<p>But thankfully, your body still feels pain. Thankfully, you can still feel hunger, thirst, exhaustion. These primitive instincts are what keep you alive.</p>
<p>Not yet gone. That already counts for something.</p>]]></content>
        <category term="letters"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Diaries, Experiences, and Reflections]]></title>
        <id>en/diaries-experiences-reflections</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/diaries-experiences-reflections"/>
        <updated>2026-04-04T16:45:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The meaning of writing things down may not necessarily lie in being seen.]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know how to define a personal blog. Some sites serve as showrooms for personal branding — people put up their photos, titles, and achievements. Some are pure life-sharing, attending to the breadth and depth of existence in a quiet, unhurried way. Others are purely technical, leaning more toward the geeky side.</p>
<p>In the past, I always complained about myself. I treated my blog like a toy, constantly switching themes and frontend styles for the novelty of it, while the actual content was perpetually stuck in labor. I still remember once trying to tweak the style of a tiny page element, only to crash the entire frontend code. I spent ages trying to fix it and couldn’t figure it out — it was genuinely demoralizing. (Now, in the Vibe Coding era, these frontend barriers are practically zero.) Every time, after tinkering for ages, “redecorating” for ages, and finally launching a blog, I would just abandon it. Because I truly didn’t know what to write.</p>
<p>I have a habit of keeping a diary. I record what happens each day. I don’t particularly enjoy writing blow-by-blow accounts — it’s more of an atmosphere diary, mainly capturing the flow of emotions throughout the day. Especially when something bad happens and some dark feelings arise, I go and write them down. Pinning down those drifting emotions. But if you asked me to put these fragmented records on a blog, I’d be afraid. Because they represent the rough, unpolished me — sentences full of grammatical flaws, arguments that can’t withstand scrutiny. It’s hard for me to be willing to put them out in public.</p>
<p>Over and over again, I’ve lost count of how many blog sites I’ve set up, how many domain names I’ve bought only to let them expire. It seems like I’ve never truly built a complete, real personal website. I don’t know if this site will last. Maybe I need to be a little braver and just present my authentic self — there’s nothing wrong with that. (Besides, the traffic on this site is pretty dismal anyway. Barely any SEO traffic, and very few people come to read it.)</p>
<p>I think what I can write mainly falls into three categories. First, what I experience and realize in daily life — the diary part. Then there’s a layer of reflection — conclusions drawn from life — though it’s hard to draw a strict line between these and the stream-of-consciousness diary entries. It’s more like they’re intertwined. Then there’s experiential stuff, like tips and how-tos. This kind of content used to be very popular online, but after AI came along, most Q&#x26;A scenarios have basically been swallowed up by AI chat boxes.</p>
<p>But the meaning of writing things down may not necessarily lie in being seen. It’s about letting yourself live more coherently, with more evidence. Knowing that you’ve lived well.</p>
<p>So be it. I’ll stick with this blog and keep updating it with real content. I admit that the content I previously put here was all AI-generated (that is, the posts dated before this one). AI generation or AI polishing gave me a sense of security — tossing my raw, rough content or ideas to AI felt like expressing myself within a safe zone, without worrying about grammatical errors or immature arguments. But in that machine-generated process, the human touch was also lost.</p>
<p>I’ll try. I’ll try, from now on, to manually arrange every word on this little blog. Writing is a skill that atrophies with disuse. You really can’t rely too heavily on AI.</p>]]></content>
        <category term="reflections"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[My Chatting Flower Has Arrived]]></title>
        <id>en/chatting-flower</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/chatting-flower"/>
        <updated>2026-03-15T01:45:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[It doesn't really do anything — it just talks. Says something out of nowhere when you walk by. Sometimes a reminder, sometimes nonsense, sometimes oddly profound.]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The Chatting Flower I pre-ordered from 2000Fun finally showed up.</p>
<p>It’s just a little figurine, so I wasn’t expecting much when I opened the box. But the moment I set it on the table, I couldn’t help but smile. It’s more refined than I imagined — 13.5 cm tall, a round little pot, colors that are unmistakably Nintendo. The parts don’t move, but when it comes to nailing the details and materials, Nintendo never disappoints.</p>
<figure><img src="https://img.thomosaic.com/blog/chatting-flower/chatting-flower-on-desk.webp" alt="Chatting Flower on my desk"><figcaption>Chatting Flower on my desk</figcaption></figure>
<p>When I played <em>Super Mario Bros. Wonder</em>, the Talking Flower was my favorite character. It doesn’t really do anything — it just talks. Says something out of nowhere when you walk by. Sometimes a reminder, sometimes nonsense, sometimes oddly profound.</p>
<p>The flower in the game made me realize that companionship doesn’t have to be useful. It’s just there, saying a thing or two, and you hear it, smile a little, then keep running your level.</p>
<p>So when Nintendo announced a real-life version, I barely hesitated.</p>
<p>I pre-ordered it on 2000Fun — HK$209 for the item, plus HK$37 in fees, HK$246 total. Not exactly cheap, but not outrageous either. About the price of one Switch game cartridge, except this one talks back.</p>
<figure><img src="https://img.thomosaic.com/blog/chatting-flower/2000fun-order-receipt.webp" alt="2000Fun order receipt"><figcaption>2000Fun order receipt</figcaption></figure>
<p>The flower does more than I expected. It starts talking on its own — randomly, without any input from you. You can also press a button to trigger a conversation, and pressing it multiple times might unlock something special.</p>
<p>It has an alarm, tells the time, and can even sense the room temperature. Every now and then it plays the <em>Wonder</em> background music and shouts “Wonder!” The voice lines are faithful to the game, it supports 10 languages including Chinese, and there’s a handy mute button.</p>
<p>It runs on two AA batteries. The ones my Xbox controller drained — just enough juice left for a second life in a flower pot.</p>
<p>I was going to keep it in my room, but then I changed my mind and moved it to the living room.</p>
<p>When you live alone, your room is the most private space — but also the quietest. The living room is different. You see it when you walk in. You hear it while you’re cooking. You’re zoning out on the couch and it suddenly says something, and for a second, it feels like someone’s there.</p>
<p>The trade-off, of course, is the occasional jump scare. Late at night, curled up in bed scrolling my phone, and it suddenly starts talking from the living room. My heart genuinely skips a beat.</p>
<p>But you know what — getting scared by a flower is, in itself, pretty funny.</p>
<p>I think we’re always looking for that kind of companionship that’s just right. The kind that doesn’t need a response. The kind that doesn’t need maintenance. The Chatting Flower is probably that sort of thing — it doesn’t care whether you’re there or not. It just sits there, talking to itself.</p>
<p>And every once in a while, you catch what it says, and you think: this moment is nice.</p>
<p>HK$246 can buy you a reason to smile every now and then. I’d say that’s worth it.</p>]]></content>
        <category term="Nintendo"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Should I Get an OpenClaw Too?]]></title>
        <id>en/openclaw-vs-claude-code</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/openclaw-vs-claude-code"/>
        <updated>2026-03-11T07:28:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The lobster (OpenClaw) is everywhere—here's why I'd recommend Claude Code instead]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few months, you’ve almost certainly seen this lobster 🦞.</p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>OpenClaw</strong></a>—the open-source project with a lobster logo—racked up 34,000+ Stars within 48 hours of launching on GitHub, and broke 250,000+ in four months. For comparison, React took a decade to reach that number. In its first week, the official website drew 2 million unique visitors.</p>
<p>So it’s hard not to think: should I be using it too?</p>
<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="what-is-the-lobster-openclaw-exactly"><h2 id="what-is-the-lobster-openclaw-exactly"><a href="#what-is-the-lobster-openclaw-exactly">What Is the Lobster (OpenClaw), Exactly?</a></h2>
<p>OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot, then Moltbot—three name changes already, which tells you something about their product instincts) is an open-source local AI assistant. It runs on your own machine and takes commands through chat apps like WhatsApp, Telegram, Discord, and Lark, <a href="https://www.digitalocean.com/resources/articles/what-is-openclaw" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">working for you 24/7</a>.</p>
<p>Its core pitch boils down to one sentence: you now have a digital employee that never sleeps.</p>
<p>It supports Claude, GPT-4o, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Ollama local models—no vendor lock-in. With 3,000+ ClawHub Skills, it can control browsers, read and write files, manage smart home devices, and send and receive emails. All data is stored locally, never passing through third-party servers.</p>
<p>Sounds great. Some people have even bought a dedicated Mac Mini to run it around the clock.</p>
<p>But if you’re someone who sits at a terminal writing code every day, do you really need this lobster?</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="why-is-the-lobster-openclaw-so-popular"><h2 id="why-is-the-lobster-openclaw-so-popular"><a href="#why-is-the-lobster-openclaw-so-popular">Why Is the Lobster (OpenClaw) So Popular?</a></h2>
<p>Before answering “should I use it,” let’s first understand “why is it popular.”</p>
<p>Because the reasons a product goes viral and whether it’s right for you are often two completely different things.</p>
<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="-narrative-audience"><h3 id="-narrative-audience"><a href="#-narrative-audience">① Narrative Audience</a></h3>
<p>Claude Code’s users are people who already know how to code—they don’t need to be convinced that “AI is useful.” But OpenClaw’s story is told to everyone: “You have an employee that never sleeps.” One story’s audience is tens of millions of developers; the other’s is billions of ordinary people. The distribution base is on a fundamentally different scale.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="-demos"><h3 id="-demos"><a href="#-demos">② Demos</a></h3>
<p>Claude Code’s most impressive moments come from precisely refactoring clean architecture out of a tangled codebase. Only people who’ve written code will gasp at that. But “the lobster auto-applied to jobs for me” or “the lobster organized my photos”—even your grandparents would want to share that.</p>
<p>This is a structural advantage in product virality, unrelated to technical strength.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="-the-chessboard-not-the-chess-piece"><h3 id="-the-chessboard-not-the-chess-piece"><a href="#-the-chessboard-not-the-chess-piece">③ The Chessboard, Not the Chess Piece</a></h3>
<p>OpenClaw isn’t the strongest player, but it’s the chessboard. It can simultaneously orchestrate Claude, GPT, Codex, and shell scripts, sitting at the very top of the dispatch chain. When it calls Claude to execute a coding task, Claude actually becomes its tool. This architectural position gives it a natural narrative of “integrating everything.”</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="-the-exponential-spread-of-open-source"><h3 id="-the-exponential-spread-of-open-source"><a href="#-the-exponential-spread-of-open-source">④ The Exponential Spread of Open Source</a></h3>
<p>Open source isn’t just free. It means every developer who deploys it, customizes it, or writes a tutorial for it automatically becomes its salesperson. AutoGPT’s viral trajectory in 2023 followed almost the exact same path—the same “AI works autonomously” narrative, the same open-source community energy. This kind of distribution momentum is something commercial products can’t buy.</p>
<p>Of course, we’ll talk about what happened to AutoGPT later.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="-the-invisible-hand"><h3 id="-the-invisible-hand"><a href="#-the-invisible-hand">⑤ The Invisible Hand</a></h3>
<p>Each Agent task in OpenClaw consumes 5 to 20 times the tokens of a normal conversation (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47064470" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">according to developer community estimates</a>). Continuously running Agents also generate logs, queues, vector databases, browser instances, and a whole chain of cloud resource consumption.</p>
<p>In other words: the more OpenClaw users there are, the more money LLM providers make, and the more money cloud providers make. The entire industry chain is riding the wave.</p>
</section></section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="different-design-philosophies"><h2 id="different-design-philosophies"><a href="#different-design-philosophies">Different Design Philosophies</a></h2>
<p>A side-by-side table makes the differences immediately clear:</p>
<div class="table-wrapper">













































<table><thead><tr><th>Dimension</th><th>Claude Code</th><th>OpenClaw</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Positioning</td><td>Coding Agent built for developers</td><td>All-purpose life/work automation assistant</td></tr><tr><td>Interface</td><td>Terminal / VS Code / JetBrains / Xcode</td><td>WhatsApp / Telegram / Discord</td></tr><tr><td>Models</td><td>Claude (Sonnet / Opus)</td><td>Claude, GPT-4o, DeepSeek, Ollama, etc.</td></tr><tr><td>Code</td><td>Top-tier: IDE integration, diff view, multi-file refactoring</td><td>Basic: can run scripts, no IDE integration</td></tr><tr><td>Security</td><td>Anthropic sandbox isolation</td><td>System-level permissions, risk is on you</td></tr><tr><td>Setup</td><td>~30 seconds</td><td>30–60 minutes</td></tr><tr><td>Cost</td><td>$20/month Pro or pay-per-token</td><td>Free software + API costs</td></tr></tbody></table>
</div>
<blockquote>
<p>Table data sources: <a href="https://claudefa.st/blog/tools/extensions/openclaw-vs-claude-code" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">claudefa.st</a> / <a href="https://www.datacamp.com/blog/openclaw-vs-claude-code" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">datacamp</a> / <a href="https://o-mega.ai/articles/claude-code-pricing-2026-costs-plans-and-alternatives" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">o-mega.ai</a> / <a href="https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/openclaw-security" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">hostinger</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>But more important than the table is a single dividing line:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>The dividing line between the two is “how clear is your intent.”</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Claude Code: precise, controllable, with the ability to intervene at any point in the process.</p>
<p>OpenClaw: you don’t want to manage the how—you just want the result.</p>
<p>One is a deterministic execution engine; the other is an autonomous exploration Agent. This isn’t about which is better or worse—it’s two fundamentally different design philosophies.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="what-you-wont-see-in-the-demos"><h2 id="what-you-wont-see-in-the-demos"><a href="#what-you-wont-see-in-the-demos">What You Won’t See in the Demos</a></h2>
<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="cost"><h3 id="cost"><a href="#cost">Cost</a></h3>
<p>OpenClaw the software is free, but the API costs for Agent calls are another story. Community members have reported that running a moderately complex long task can cost <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1qrzxs7/openclaw_is_godawful_its_either_you_have_to_spend/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">“enough to just hire someone on Fiverr”</a>. And if you try running Ollama locally to save money, inference speed on an RTX 3070 is <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ArtificialInteligence/comments/1qrzxs7/openclaw_is_godawful_its_either_you_have_to_spend/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">“like watching paint dry”</a>.</p>
<p>If the task definition is even slightly vague, the Agent can enter infinite tool-call loops, <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47064470" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">burning through the entire context window in a few hours</a>—under a pay-per-API model, that means an exploding bill.</p>
<p>Claude Code’s Pro subscription is $20/month, with roughly 40–80 hours of usage per week. Predictable and controllable.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="security"><h3 id="security"><a href="#security">Security</a></h3>
<p>Using OpenClaw, you’re essentially handing over your entire computer’s permissions to an LLM-driven Agent. This is equivalent to <a href="https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/openclaw-security" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">granting root-level control to all untrusted inputs</a>.</p>
<p>Many users enable permissive settings during testing for convenience and never tighten them afterward. LLMs remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks to this day. Even more alarming, after OpenClaw’s explosive growth, <a href="https://openclaw-hub.org/openclaw-hub-clawhavoc-incident.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">341 malicious plugins were discovered</a>, targeting passwords, browser cookies, and cryptocurrency wallet data—the biggest trust crisis in its growth trajectory.</p>
<p>Security researchers have documented similar cases: explicitly telling the Agent “do not delete emails,” and <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/openclaw-hit-60000-github-stars-72-hours-deleted-someones-grover-f2opc" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">it deleted them anyway</a>. The price of autonomous takeover is that you never know when it will go rogue.</p>
<p>Claude Code’s code execution is protected by Anthropic’s sandbox, with operations restricted to the working directory and project level.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="autogpt"><h3 id="autogpt"><a href="#autogpt">AutoGPT</a></h3>
<p>In 2023, AutoGPT went viral along almost the exact same path—the “AI works autonomously” narrative, the viral spread through the open-source community, and an avalanche of “it changed my life” posts. What happened next? It was proven to be highly unreliable for complex tasks, and community enthusiasm faded quickly.</p>
<p>I’m not saying OpenClaw will necessarily follow the same path. But this history is worth thinking about before you commit.</p>
</section></section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="so-who-should-use-the-lobster"><h2 id="so-who-should-use-the-lobster"><a href="#so-who-should-use-the-lobster">So, Who Should Use the Lobster?</a></h2>
<p>After all that, I’m not saying OpenClaw has no value. Quite the opposite—it’s genuinely useful for these scenarios:</p>
<ul>
<li>You’re not a developer and want to automate daily tasks using natural language</li>
<li>You need cross-platform orchestration (email + calendar + chat + files) and are willing to bear the cost of configuration and security management</li>
<li>You enjoy the process of tinkering with open-source projects itself</li>
</ul>
<p>But if your daily life is sitting in an IDE writing code, reading code, and refactoring code—Claude Code is the tool designed for you.</p>
<p>Anthropic’s official positioning of Claude Code is refreshingly straightforward: <a href="https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>“an agentic coding tool that lives in your terminal”</strong></a>. No grand narrative about digital employees, no emotional appeals about changing your life.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="final-thoughts"><h2 id="final-thoughts"><a href="#final-thoughts">Final Thoughts</a></h2>
<p>So the most important question isn’t “should I get one too”—it’s asking yourself first: what problem do I actually need to solve?</p></section>]]></content>
        <category term="OpenClaw"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Saṅkhāra-dukkha]]></title>
        <id>en/sankhara-dukkha</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/sankhara-dukkha"/>
        <updated>2026-03-10T01:15:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[All things are impermanent and in flux]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I realized I was enduring a video game.</p>
<p>Not enjoying—enduring. Link was scaling some cliff on the plains of Hyrule, one turn of the camera away from a sweeping vista, and my thumb was going through mechanical motions on the joystick, my mind occupied with: how many more shrines after this one. The feeling wasn’t boredom—boredom is at least a stance. It was closer to sitting in a dentist’s waiting room. You know the thing will eventually be over. You’re just waiting for it to be over.</p>
<p>So I pressed the HOME button, quit the game, and stared at the Switch’s main screen for a few seconds.</p>
<p>A few seconds is enough time to do a lot of things. Like confirming you don’t want to tap on a single icon in the list. Like registering a diffuse, low-grade nausea, as if someone gently wrung something inside your stomach and then let go. I closed the console and set it aside. The motion was calm—like a man who has already accepted his sentence straightening his tie.</p>
<p>I bought Sartre’s <em>Being and Nothingness</em> a few months ago. I’ve read forty-seven pages, thirty of which were the same chapter opened and closed again on different afternoons. He said man is thrown into freedom. Fine, but he didn’t say what to do after you’ve been thrown and discover that the open field of freedom has nothing growing in it. (To be fair, he might have addressed that later. I haven’t gotten that far.) The bookmark has stayed in the same spot so long it’s left a crease—like a permanent scar. A very small scar. The kind not worth noticing.</p>
<p>Music doesn’t work anymore either. R&#x26;B used to do something for me—those humid, reverb-softened voices once set off a kind of resonance in my chest. Now I put on my headphones, the playlist scrolls on its own, singers take turns crooning about love, loss, late nights, and what I hear is sound waves. To be precise: air vibrating in regular patterns.</p>
<p>At times like these, psychology offers a word: anhedonia. It sounds very professional, very weighty, as though your suffering has been given a Latin name and thereby granted a kind of legitimacy. But I’m clearly not depressed. I can eat and sleep (though sleep quality is mediocre), I show up to work on time, submit my weekly reports on schedule, and when I reply “Got it, thanks” on WeChat I even bother to add a period for the sake of propriety. A person with depression wouldn’t care about the period. Probably.</p>
<p>So what is this, exactly.</p>
<p>I spent some time trying to figure out what I was anxious about. It’s like opening the fridge, certain you’re hungry, only to stand before a full fridge unable to name a single thing you want to eat. It’s not that nothing tastes good. It’s that your hunger itself is broken. It doesn’t point toward the lack of any specific thing—it just is lack. Buddhism calls this saṅkhāra-dukkha: the suffering of formations, the idea that existence itself carries a baseline hum of dissatisfaction. The description is precise—so precise it’s infuriating, because it amounts to telling you: yes, that’s how it is, and no, there’s nothing to be done.</p>
<p>Sometimes I’ve thought about killing myself.</p>
<p>But the thought always shows up in such a half-hearted way. Not the dramatic standing-on-the-rooftop-hair-whipping-in-the-wind kind. More like you’re sitting on the toilet scrolling your phone and the words “maybe just call it quits” drift through, and then a push notification pops up about a food delivery discount, and the thought dissolves. It’s too light. So light you can’t be sure whether it counts as a thought at all, or just a random firing of nerve endings.</p>
<p>More than dying, I lean toward a gentler and far more impossible option: never having come at all. Not disappearing—disappearing implies first existing and then being erased, a process, traces to clean up, the question of what to do about your social media accounts. Rather, there simply never having been such a person to begin with. One fewer variable in the world’s equation, no effect on the computation. Very clean.</p>
<p>But this too is just a thought.</p>
<p>Because while you’re thinking these things, your stomach growls. Or a delivery arrives. Or the toilet tank lets out an enigmatic gurgle. The body and the everyday possess a kind of blunt-force hegemony; they don’t allow you to see nihilism through to its conclusion. You can believe everything is meaningless and still agonize over which restaurant to pick on the delivery app. This is the most undignified part of the human condition: your existential crisis can never beat your stomach.</p>
<p>So I wait. Not for anything specific—not for a person, a job, an opportunity. For a kind of moment. It happens occasionally, without cause: the texture of reality suddenly shifts. Maybe it’s the shape of a cloud at dusk, maybe a certain vocal run in a song that pierces through the membrane, maybe waking at midnight to find moonlight pooled on the floor. You can’t say why, but for that one second you feel that being alive is acceptable.</p>
<p>Just that one second. Then it leaves, and the world reverts to normal.</p>
<p>I don’t know what to call it. Grace—the word is too grand. Satori—too Buddhist. Channeling—too charlatan. Probably just the brain secreting a little something now and then, rewarding you for not giving up. A very physiological affair.</p>
<p>But I am, in fact, holding on for that one second.</p>
<p>Saying this out loud is neither heroic nor poignant—it’s even a little absurd. Like a man walking through a desert, not because he believes there’s an oasis ahead, but because last time he was walking, a drop of dew happened to land on his lips.</p>
<p>That’s all.</p>
<p>He keeps walking. Not brave, not strong. Just still walking.</p>]]></content>
        <category term="Stories"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Secret]]></title>
        <id>en/secret-bomb</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/secret-bomb"/>
        <updated>2026-03-05T09:46:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A Bomb Not Worth Mentioning]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I was brushing my teeth this morning when I suddenly realized I am a counterfeit.</p>
<p>My mouth was full of foam. The person in the mirror didn’t look very presentable. But presentability wasn’t exactly my top concern at the moment.</p>
<p>I have a secret.</p>
<p>What it is doesn’t matter. What matters is that it’s there, like an object, taking up space. I can feel its weight. Not weight in the literary sense — a very physical sensation, like wearing too many layers in winter. Everything feels off, but you can’t quite tell which layer you should take off.</p>
<p>I watch people a lot.</p>
<p>A colleague of mine, last week at lunch, told us he’d failed four classes in college and nearly didn’t graduate. He was laughing when he said it. Everyone else was laughing too. The air was still air. The chopsticks were still chopsticks. Nothing changed. I sat there chewing my scrambled eggs with tomato, thinking: some people just have it easier. Their secrets come out as jokes. Mine would come out as an incident.</p>
<p>That’s probably not fair. Everyone thinks their own secret is the heaviest one. Psychology probably has a name for this tendency — some bias, some effect. But knowing the name doesn’t help. It’s like learning you have “influenza” instead of “sore throat plus feeling like shit.” You don’t feel any less like shit.</p>
<p>Sometimes I imagine saying it out loud.</p>
<p>The scene usually goes like this: I’m sitting somewhere, one person or many people across from me, and I open my mouth. My voice is steady, like I’m reading from a script I’ve prepared. Then — then nothing. My imagination breaks off right there. It’s not that I can’t picture the consequences. Quite the opposite. I can picture them too clearly. Everyone’s eyes would gain an extra layer. I’d go from being “a normal person” to being “that person.” A permanent parenthetical trailing after my name.</p>
<p>You know the kind.</p>
<p>But there are moments — usually at three in the morning, or on some particularly ordinary afternoon, like right now — when I feel an almost irrepressible urge to just say it, out loud, to everyone. Not out of bravery. Out of exhaustion. Keeping a secret is physical labor. Constant, highly repetitive, no-overtime-pay physical labor. I’ve mentally submitted three hundred resignation letters. Not one has been approved.</p>
<p>On second thought, that urge lasts about seven seconds. Roughly the same duration as a sneeze.</p>
<p>Then it passes.</p>
<p>So I took the third path — doing nothing. Not choosing is itself a choice; that sentence belongs on the cover of a bestselling self-help book, paired with a blurry ocean sunset. But in practice it doesn’t feel like that. It’s standing in the middle of the road, both directions open, and you look down at your shoes and start wondering if it’s time to replace them. Not numbness. A remarkably precise attention to things that don’t matter.</p>
<p>Life goes on as usual.</p>
<p>Alarm. Get up. Brush teeth. Leave the house. On the subway a kid keeps kicking the back of my seat; his mother is on her phone. Get to the office, turn on the computer, answer emails. A colleague asks what I’m doing this weekend. I say I haven’t decided. Lunch is a braised chicken rice bowl; the rice is a bit hard. An unnecessary meeting in the afternoon. Clock out. Go home. Sit on the couch.</p>
<p>The bomb is still there.</p>
<p>It hasn’t gone off. It hasn’t gotten smaller. It’s just there.</p>
<p>A package arrives. A pair of slippers I ordered three days ago. Gray. I open the box, try them on. They fit.</p>
<p>I think, well. At least one thing went right today.</p>]]></content>
        <category term="Stories"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[My 2025]]></title>
        <id>en/2025</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/2025"/>
        <updated>2025-12-13T15:58:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[“Completion”, “Framework”, and “Relationships”]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>This content is a collection of personal musings and diary entries. It holds no practical utility for the general reader.</p>
<p>To read, please visit the <a href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/2025">original link</a>.</p>
]]></content>
        <category term="Year in Review"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Did Vaporwave Ever Exist?]]></title>
        <id>en/vaporwave</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/vaporwave"/>
        <updated>2025-12-05T02:41:54.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[“Mourning a future we never arrived at.”]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The answer holds a great deal of tension: as a <strong>musical genre</strong>, it physically exists; but the <strong>world it depicts</strong> never existed.</p>
<p>It never “lived” in the physical world; it merely wandered as a “ghost” within the internet.</p>
<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="i-forgotten-cassettes-and-corrupted-mp3-files"><h2 id="i-forgotten-cassettes-and-corrupted-mp3-files"><a href="#i-forgotten-cassettes-and-corrupted-mp3-files">I. <strong>Forgotten Cassettes and Corrupted MP3 Files</strong></a></h2>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>It does exist.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This unique cultural genre was born in internet communities like Tumblr and Reddit in the early 2010s. Its name borrows from the computer term “Vaporware,” referring to software or hardware that is heavily advertised but never actually released. This name serves as a direct metaphor for the genre’s core themes of unfulfilled promises and essential “emptiness.”</p>
<p>Although the genre was not created by a single person, three key figures established its basic paradigms. In 2010, Daniel Lopatin released <em>Eccojams Vol.1</em>, laying the auditory foundation of “slowing down, looping, and aging”; the following year, James Ferraro established the satirical core regarding consumerism and cheap technology with <em>Far Side Virtual</em>; finally, Macintosh Plus’s <em>Floral Shoppe</em> established the visual totem with its classic pink bust of Helios (David), formally pushing this style to the masses.</p>
<p>In terms of creative logic, this is a typical form of “textual poaching,” essentially an “autopsy and reassembly” of past sounds. Producers dive into the cultural ruins of the 80s and 90s, excavating functional musical materials like Muzak, weather channel background music, or City Pop, and recreating them like stitching together a Frankenstein monster. <strong>Through extreme slowing, pitch-shifting, and reverb processing, they create an auditory effect akin to an old Walkman running out of battery or a cassette tape jamming, stripping the original tracks of their vitality and rendering them into a hazy state of “near-death” or “sleepwalking.”</strong></p>
<figure><img alt="Vektroid (aka Macintosh Plus) released “Floral Shoppe”" title="Vektroid (aka Macintosh Plus) released “Floral Shoppe”" loading="lazy" decoding="async" fetchpriority="auto" width="640" height="640" src="https://articles.thomosaic.com/_astro/floral-shoppe.BElBadYB_fcUst.webp" ><figcaption>Vektroid (aka Macintosh Plus) released “Floral Shoppe”</figcaption></figure>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="ii-the-dislocation-of-time-and-the-fabrication-of-space"><h2 id="ii-the-dislocation-of-time-and-the-fabrication-of-space"><a href="#ii-the-dislocation-of-time-and-the-fabrication-of-space">II. <strong>The Dislocation of “Time” and the Fabrication of “Space”</strong></a></h2>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>The ghost of a “dead future.”</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>From a temporal dimension, this genre embodies the concept of “Hauntology” proposed by Mark Fisher—the mourning of a <em>“cancelled future”</em> that we never truly arrived at. The 80s and 90s scenes it constructs (often Tokyo or Hong Kong) are filled with optimistic promises of a technological utopia. However, when young people in the 21st century look back, they find that this promise was never fulfilled; high technology has brought anxiety rather than liberation. Therefore, this emotion is not nostalgia for real history (the past that included a gritty reality), but a longing for that historical moment when we “believed tomorrow would be better”—an extreme manifestation of “Anemoia” (nostalgia for a time one has never known).</p>
<p>In the spatial dimension, Adam Harper describes it as “pop-art of the virtual plaza,” constructing a unique aesthetic based on “non-places.” It simulates transition spaces constructed by consumerism, such as shopping malls, elevators, and airport terminals. These places, which are cold and functional in reality, are alienated here into sacred “spiritual sanctuaries.” <strong>The auditory experience is like “looping a happy radio broadcast from 30 years ago in an empty shopping mall at midnight”—a happiness that appears particularly eerie and sorrowful because no one is listening, creating an atmosphere of solitude.</strong></p>
<p>In the ontological dimension, this is a “simulacrum” borrowing from Jean Baudrillard’s view: a “copy without an original.” It is replete with “Cyber-Orientalism” elements—such as Japanese kana and Traditional Chinese characters—which are not authentic linguistic expressions but a “Hyperreality” constructed by the Western gaze through internet filters. For creators, these characters are more like exotic decorative symbols used to build an ideal state in a parallel world, rather than a reflection of reality.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="iii-antidote-to-the-modern-dilemma"><h2 id="iii-antidote-to-the-modern-dilemma"><a href="#iii-antidote-to-the-modern-dilemma">III. “Antidote” to the Modern Dilemma?</a></h2>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Why would a group of young people born after 2010 suddenly become obsessed with “discarded music” from the 1980s?</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>On an economic level, this musical form acts as a medium for “electronic necromancy.” Facing the realities of economic stagnation and class solidification, the younger generation seeks psychological compensation by listening to these materials, largely sampled from Japan’s bubble economy era. This is not just listening to music, but a spiritual sustenance, allowing people to “soul travel” back to an era where money flowed smoothly, material goods were abundant, and hope was plentiful, reliving the prosperity of the past in an illusion.</p>
<p>At the same time, it is also a cultural resistance against modern “accelerationism.” Modern society imposes demands of “speed,” “efficiency,” and “always-on” connectivity, trapping individuals in Max Weber’s “iron cage” of rationality. The core of Vaporwave lies precisely in “deceleration”; it creates a “time detached from time.” In this unique space, the originally unstoppable pace of progress is intentionally disrupted, allowing exhausted urbanites to detach from endless competition and regain the right to “daydream.”</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="iv-a-life-philosophy"><h2 id="iv-a-life-philosophy"><a href="#iv-a-life-philosophy">IV. A Life Philosophy</a></h2>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Vaporwave is not just nostalgia; it offers a new philosophy of life.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This aesthetic embodies a unique “digital Wabi-Sabi.” Against the backdrop of mainstream aesthetics pursuing “high definition” and perfection, it goes the opposite way, appreciating the “wear and tear of data.” The compression artifacts of MP3s, the snow of VHS tapes, and the crash screens of Windows 95 are no longer seen as glitches here, but are viewed as the “patina” and naturally growing “moss” of the digital world, rich with the sense of time. This aesthetic tendency is essentially “dermabrasion” for the overly harsh and clear digital reality, polishing sharp modern life until it is soft and hazy.</p>
<p>Simultaneously, it constructs a “gentle eschatology.” Unlike the violent and dark endings in traditional cognition, the “post-human” scene depicted here is serene, pink, and even accompanied by imagery of dolphins. <strong>In this imagination, even if human civilization has ended, the escalators in the mall are still running, and holographic advertisements are still flickering lonely.</strong> This is a kind of “Cyber-Stoicism” that cuts off the obsession with linear “progress,” locking time forever in the most comfortable and pleasant second through an infinite Loop, allowing people to immerse themselves in a purposeless happiness.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="final-thoughts"><h2 id="final-thoughts"><a href="#final-thoughts">Final Thoughts</a></h2>
<p>If one must answer “Where does Vaporwave exist?”, the answer is: <strong>It exists in the cracks of reality.</strong></p>
<p>It is a spiritual creation of internet natives facing the dual dilemma of “stagnation of growth” and “technological acceleration.” They utilize those “expired future materials”—the illusions of the 80s bubble economy—to construct an “electronic utopia.”</p>
<p>Its ultimate value lies in providing an extremely elegant “exit mechanism”:
It tells us that you don’t have to participate in this game of infinite growth; you can hide in that looping cycle, on the ruins of the future, watching the eternal pink sunset, even if only for three minutes.</p>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="references"><h2 id="references"><a href="#references">References</a></h2>
<p><strong>Born, G., &#x26; Haworth, C.</strong> (2017). From Microsound To Vaporwave: Internet-Mediated Music, Online Methods, And Genre. <em>Music and Letters</em>, 98(4), 601-647.</p>
<p><strong>Harper, A.</strong> (2012). Comment: Vaporwave and the pop-art of the virtual plaza. <em>Dummy</em>. Retrieved from <a href="https://dmy.co/news/adam-harper-vaporwave" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://dummymag.com/news/adam-harper-vaporwave</a></p>
<p><strong>Tanner, G.</strong> (2016). <em>Babbling Corpse: Vaporwave And The Commodification Of Ghosts</em>. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.</p>
<p><strong>Whelan, A., &#x26; Nowak, R.</strong> (2018). Vaporwave Is (Not) a Critique of Capitalism: Genre Work in An Online Music Scene. <em>Open Cultural Studies</em>, 2(1), 451-462.</p>
<p><strong>Boym, S.</strong> (2001). <em>The Future of Nostalgia</em>. New York: Basic Books.</p>
<p><strong>Hebdige, D.</strong> (1979). <em>Subculture: The Meaning of Style</em>. London: Routledge.</p>
<p><strong>Jameson, F.</strong> (1991). <em>Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism</em>. Durham: Duke University Press.</p>
<p><strong>Jenkins, H.</strong> (1992). <em>Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture</em>. New York: Routledge.</p></section>]]></content>
        <category term="Hauntology"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[How to Fake Being a Wine Expert?]]></title>
        <id>en/wine-guide</id>
        <link href="https://articles.thomosaic.com/en/wine-guide"/>
        <updated>2025-12-03T08:28:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[A Guide to Getting Tipsy]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="part-1-look-smell-taste"><h2 id="part-1-look-smell-taste"><a href="#part-1-look-smell-taste">Part 1. Look, Smell, Taste</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Look:</strong> Is it translucent like a gemstone, or deep like ink? (Skin thickness of the grape variety)</li>
<li><strong>Smell:</strong> Don’t swirl the glass; smell it first (static aroma); swirl it and smell again (released aroma). Look for any familiar fruit scents?</li>
<li><strong>Taste:</strong> Swallow it.
<ul>
<li>Do the sides of your tongue salivate? (Acidity)</li>
<li>Do your gums feel dry? (Tannin)</li>
<li>Does it feel like drinking whole milk or water in your mouth? (Body)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="part-2-deconstructing-a-sip"><h2 id="part-2-deconstructing-a-sip"><a href="#part-2-deconstructing-a-sip">Part 2. Deconstructing a Sip</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Tannin:</strong> After drinking, do your gums and tongue coating feel dry and astringent? Like drinking strong tea. Tannins support the aging potential and structural sense of red wine.</li>
<li><strong>Acidity:</strong> After drinking, do the sides of your tongue salivate crazily? The more saliva, the higher the acidity. Acidity makes the wine lively and not cloying.</li>
<li><strong>Body:</strong> The weight of the liquid in the mouth. Is it like drinking water (light body), skim milk (medium body), or whole milk (full body)?</li>
<li><strong>Aroma:</strong> Are there familiar fruit scents? Is it fresh strawberry or stewed black plum?</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="part-3-about-grapes"><h2 id="part-3-about-grapes"><a href="#part-3-about-grapes">Part 3. About Grapes</a></h2>
<p>If you can’t remember the characteristics of the varieties, try personifying them first.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Cabernet Sauvignon: The CEO in a Suit</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>Characteristics:</em> Thick skin, heavy tannin, strong aging potential. Serious, orthodox, stern.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Merlot: The Gentle Girl/Guy Next Door</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>Characteristics:</em> Fleshy, thin skin, supple tannin. Round and juicy, a crowd-pleaser, hated by no one.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Pinot Noir: Lin Daiyu (The Fragile Beauty)</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>Characteristics:</em> Extremely high-maintenance, very thin skin. Fears both cold and heat, prone to illness. But when brewed well, it is peerless in elegance and grace.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Riesling: The STEM Scholar with Glasses</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>Characteristics:</em> Extremely high acidity, precise like a scalpel. After aging, it develops a unique “petrol note,” which is actually a symbol of high quality.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="part-4-styles-and-variables"><h2 id="part-4-styles-and-variables"><a href="#part-4-styles-and-variables">Part 4. Styles and Variables</a></h2>
<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="1-old-world-vs-new-world"><h3 id="1-old-world-vs-new-world"><a href="#1-old-world-vs-new-world">1. Old World vs. New World</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Old World:</strong> Mainly Europe (France, Italy, Spain)
<ul>
<li><em>Style:</em> Fallen aristocracy. Emphasizes “Terroir,” “Restraint,” and “Food Pairing.” Labels often list the <strong>region</strong> (e.g., Bordeaux); you have to understand it, it doesn’t cater to you.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>New World:</strong> USA, Australia, Chile, etc.
<ul>
<li><em>Style:</em> California sunshine boy. Emphasizes “Technology,” “Fruitiness,” and “Boldness.” Gives you a big hug right away (intense fruit flavor). Labels often list the <strong>variety</strong> (e.g., Cabernet Sauvignon).</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="2-sky-earth-human"><h3 id="2-sky-earth-human"><a href="#2-sky-earth-human">2. Sky, Earth, Human</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Sky (Climate):</strong>
<ul>
<li>Hot: High alcohol, low acidity, ripe fruit flavor (like jam).</li>
<li>Cold: High acidity, crisp (like fresh berries).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Earth (Soil):</strong> Barren land actually produces good wine. Vines need to struggle to take root in order to produce fruit with concentrated flavor.</li>
<li><strong>Human (Winemaking):</strong> Oak barrels are the “filters” added to wine. It brings flavors of vanilla, toast, and cream.</li>
</ul>
</section></section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="part-5-cold-facts-about-drinking"><h2 id="part-5-cold-facts-about-drinking"><a href="#part-5-cold-facts-about-drinking">Part 5. Cold Facts about “Drinking”</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><strong>Why do we clink glasses?</strong>
<ul>
<li><em>Legend Version:</em> To prevent poisoning in the Middle Ages, clinking vigorously splashed liquid into each other’s cups, “if we die, we die together.”</li>
<li><em>Sensory Version:</em> Vision (color), Smell (aroma), Taste (flavor), Touch (holding the glass) are all involved, only Hearing has nothing to do. Clinking makes a sound, completing the five senses.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>“Drink at Room Temperature” is a Trap:</strong>
<ul>
<li>The “room temperature” in old books refers to the room temperature of medieval European castles (about 15-18°C).</li>
<li>Modern interiors are easily 25°C; drinking red wine feels like drinking “hot soup,” and the alcohol sensation is rushing. <strong>Red wine usually tastes better slightly chilled (20 minutes in the fridge).</strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Wine Legs = Good Wine?</strong>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wrong.</strong> Wine legs only indicate two things: high alcohol content, or high sugar content. It has nothing to do with quality.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>The Deeper the Punt (Bottom Indentation), the Better?</strong>
<ul>
<li><strong>Absolutely not.</strong> The punt was originally for bottle blowing stability and collecting sediment in old wines. Now many cheap wines purposely make deep punts to appear “high-end,” actually just increasing bottle weight and shipping costs.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Sulfites are Not Poison:</strong>
<ul>
<li>It is an antioxidant and preservative. Without it, you’d be drinking grape vinegar. A bag of candied fruit likely contains several times more sulfites than a bottle of red wine.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="2" aria-labelledby="part-6-advanced-learning-to-do"><h2 id="part-6-advanced-learning-to-do"><a href="#part-6-advanced-learning-to-do">Part 6. Advanced Learning To-Do</a></h2>
<section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="1-book-recommendations-bibliotherapy"><h3 id="1-book-recommendations-bibliotherapy"><a href="#1-book-recommendations-bibliotherapy">1. Book Recommendations (Bibliotherapy)</a></h3>
<p><strong>Beginner Essentials:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>“Wine Folly: The Essential Guide to Wine” (Madeline Puckette)</strong>: Also known as the Magnum Edition. <strong>First choice for beginners</strong>. Extremely visual, with lots of charts, maps, and flavor wheels, as easy as reading a picture book.</li>
<li><strong>“The New Wine Rules” (Jon Bonné)</strong>: Helps you eliminate the “reverence” for wine, breaking knowledge down into simple basics, perfect for socially anxious beginners.</li>
<li><strong>“Wine Simple”</strong>: Simple and easy to understand, suitable as a coffee table book to flip through anytime.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Systematic Learning:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>“Kevin Zraly Windows on the World Complete Wine Course”</strong>: Classic introductory textbook, helps you build a solid knowledge framework; once read, learning others is easy.</li>
<li><strong>“The Wine Bible” (Karen MacNeil)</strong>: Very comprehensive, covering regional history and top producers, suitable for those wanting to dive deep into details.</li>
<li><strong>“The World Atlas of Wine”</strong>: Not just a book, but an atlas. Suitable for readers interested in geography and terroir.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Fun/Narrative (Bedtime Reading):</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>“Cork Dork” (Bianca Bosker)</strong>: Tells the story of a journalist trying to infiltrate the sommelier circle, profound and interesting, revealing the “insider info” of sommeliers.</li>
<li><strong>“Adventures on the Wine Route” (Kermit Lynch)</strong>: Classic road-trip style wine book, relaxed and fun.</li>
<li><strong>“Godforsaken Grapes”</strong>: If you are interested in those obscure, strange, forgotten grape varieties, read this.</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="2-podcasts--websites"><h3 id="2-podcasts--websites"><a href="#2-podcasts--websites">2. Podcasts &#x26; Websites</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Podcast:</strong> <strong>“Wine for Normal People”</strong>. Rated as more accessible than the book of the same name, trustworthy information, perfect for beginners to train their ears.</li>
<li><strong>Site/Social:</strong> <strong>Wine Folly</strong>. Besides the books, their website and Instagram are also the best sources for fragmented learning.</li>
</ul>
</section><section class="heading" data-heading-rank="3" aria-labelledby="3-unorthodox-training-methods"><h3 id="3-unorthodox-training-methods"><a href="#3-unorthodox-training-methods">3. Unorthodox Training Methods</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Fruit Comparison Method:</strong> Buy blueberries, blackberries, and plums to eat, remember the taste, then drink water to rinse, and then drink red wine. This is the fastest way to train the brain to connect “label descriptions” with “real taste.”</li>
<li><strong>From Sweet to Dry:</strong> Can’t stand the bitterness of dry red? Start with <strong>Roscato</strong>, <strong>Brachetto</strong>, or Californian <strong>Zinfandel</strong> and transition slowly.</li>
<li><strong>Don’t Buy New Books:</strong> For massive tomes like the “Oxford Companion to Wine,” buy used or old editions. The money saved is better spent on a good bottle of wine to drink into your belly.</li>
</ul></section></section>]]></content>
        <category term="Wine"/>
    </entry>
</feed>